Last Updated on August 12, 2020 by

J & J to appeal $4.7 billion verdict claiming asbestos is in their talc 

Johnson & Johnson are set to appeal a $4.7 billion verdict where asbestos was found in their talc which has been awarded to 22 women in the U.S claiming the companies talc products gave them ovarian cancer.

5 weeks of expert testimony from each side led to the jury making their decision in less than one day.

The talc manufacturer claims that the science used in the case put forward by the claimants was inaccurate and as such, the case shouldn’t have been heard in Missouri.

However, a number of  legal experts say that Johnson & Johnson will struggle when it comes to appealing the verdict, despite their recent success in winning other appeals of similar cases in Missouri.

The reason being that the Missouri courts are well known for being supportive of plaintiffs.

Johnson and Johnson released a statement after the verdict saying that none of their products have ever contained asbestos.

This is the largest case to date involving allegations of asbestos contaminated talc causing cancer.

In the U.S, Johnson & Johnson face 9,000 cases over asbestos contaminated talc.

It is expected that Johnson & Johnson will go through the appeals process, but it’s most probable that they will end up settling the case.

Although, their lawyer argues this, saying they have no interest in settling.

The company’s main argument for appeal is that the majority of the 22 plaintiffs were not even residents of Missouri, and so they shouldn’t have been allowed to sue the New Jersey based company.

Reason being that a U.S. Supreme Court decision was recently made stating that jurisdiction over injury lawsuits brought by non residents against out of state companies severely restricted the state courts.

It is this decision that enabled Johnson & Johnson to win their appeals on other talc verdicts in Missouri.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer, Mark Lanier said “I hope they focus their appeal on jurisdiction because I’m confident we’ll win that.”

J & J say scientific testing proves talc is safe

The $4.69 billion in total damages includes $550 million in compensatory damages and $4.14 billion in punitive damages.

Another argument J & J will be pursuing is that rigourous scientific testing over the years has shown that the company’s talc based products are perfectly safe and have never contained asbestos.

Did you enjoy reading about Asbestos contaminated talc?  Then check out our other posts below.

Whether you need an asbestos management survey, or a refurbishment/ demolition survey, contact us on 0161 763 3727 or by visiting https://www.armco.org.uk/

Finally, for all your asbestos training needs call 0161 761 4424 or visit https://www.armcoasbestostraining.co.uk/to book an asbestos awareness training course.

Latest News...

Training That Changes Outcomes, Not Just Knowledge

January 8, 2026Last Updated on January 22, 2026 by Phil Collins Asbestos training is often delivered as a compliance exercise. People attend, pass a short assessment, and return to work unchanged. Effective training does something different: it changes what people do when it matters. That means teaching: When staff understand not just the rules, but the consequences of […] [...] Read more...

Sort Your Asbestos Training This Winter Before the Spring Rush Hits

December 18, 2025Last Updated on January 22, 2026 by Phil Collins Asbestos training is one of those things that gets pushed to the bottom of the list, there is always something more urgent. But if you are putting it off until you actually need it, you are making life harder for yourself. What’s Asbestos Awareness Training Anyway? […] [...] Read more...

Get your Asbestos Contracts Manager Refresher training done before Winter

November 21, 2025Last Updated on November 21, 2025 by Phil Collins If you are a contracts manager in asbestos removal, you already know your certificate is only good for 12 months. What you might not have thought about is how close we are to winter and the start of 2026. Now’s the time to check your dates. […] [...] Read more...

The Hidden Cost of Skipping Asbestos Training in the UK

November 7, 2025Last Updated on November 21, 2025 by Phil Collins When money’s tight, training gets pushed to the bottom of the list. Asbestos awareness training probably feels like another expense you could do without. But here’s the thing – skipping it costs way more than paying for it ever would. The Legal Nightmare The HSE takes […] [...] Read more...

RPE Training After COVID: Why Your Team Needs It Now

September 26, 2025Last Updated on October 6, 2025 by Phil Collins COVID changed a lot about workplace safety. Suddenly, everyone was talking about masks, air quality and respiratory protection (even though Face Fit Testing has actually been a legal requirement since the late 90’s). Three years on and companies are still catching up with what this means […] [...] Read more...

What is non-licensed asbestos (Cat B) training?

September 10, 2025Last Updated on October 6, 2025 by Phil Collins Non-licensed asbestos training (which used to be referred to as Cat B training) is one of the many types of asbestos training courses that we provide at Armco, and it is designed for individuals, businesses and contractors who will knowingly disturb asbestos as part of their […] [...] Read more...

Published Jul 17, 2018